NO ON S.RES 135 IS THE UNITED STATES PREPARING TO LEGALISE ITS UNILATERAL MOVES TO RECOGNISE KOSOVO-METOHIJA AS AN INDEPENDENT STATE?

update: Christ Is Risen! Indeed He Is Risen!!!
Archbishop Jovan of Macedonia was freed and able to attend the Paschal Service. He had to return to prison for 9 more days, but when he is finished with that, he will be completely free.
Of course, Glory To God, and many thanks to Snezana Denker and her petition, and her vigilence.
Amen!!!

NO ON SENATE RESOLUTION 135

They are trying to pass legislation in the Senate to compel Congress to Support Independence For Kosovo. Please call and write your representatives about this and to let your voice be heard.

Here is the text of the legislation:
----- Original Message -----
From: Serbian Unity Congress
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2007 9:46 AM
Subject: Fw: S. RES. 135
\< http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:S.RES.135:>>> Expressing the sense of the Senate that the United States should support > independence for Kosovo. (Introduced in Senate)>> SRES 135 IS>>> 110th CONGRESS>> 1st Session>> S. RES. 135>> Expressing the sense of the Senate that the United States should support > independence for Kosovo .>>> IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES>>> March 29, 2007> Mr. LIEBERMAN (for himself, Mr. BIDEN, Mr. MCCAIN, and Mr. SMITH) > submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on > Foreign Relations>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------->>> RESOLUTION>> Expressing the sense of the Senate that the United States should support > independence for Kosovo .>> Whereas the United States has enduring national interests in the peace and > security of southeastern Europe, and in the greater integration of the > region into the Euro-Atlantic community of democratic, well-governed > states;>> Whereas, in March 1999, the United States, along with other members of the > North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO), commenced military action aimed > at ending Slobodan Milosevic's brutal campaign of ethnic cleansing against > the people of Kosovo ;>> Whereas that military action resulted in the defeat of Serb forces and the > creation of the United Nations Mission in Kosovo , an interim United > Nations administration that governs Kosovo , and which ended, de facto, > the sovereignty that was previously exercised by the Government of the > Federal Republic of Yugoslavia over Kosovo ;>> Whereas the men and women of the Armed Forces of the United States have > served bravely in Kosovo since 1999, and their presence and participation > in the NATO-led Kosovo Force has been indispensable in protecting the > people of Kosovo and stabilizing the region;>> Whereas United Nations administration was never intended nor understood as > a permanent solution to the political status of Kosovo ;>> Whereas, in light of NATO's military intervention in Kosovo and the United > Nations trusteeship established in Kosovo pursuant to United Nations > Security Council Resolution 1244 (1999), the international community has > recognized the political circumstances in Kosovo as unique, and the > settlement of Kosovo's status therefore does not establish a precedent for > the resolution of other conflicts;>> Whereas continuing uncertainty about the status of Kosovo is unacceptable > to the overwhelming majority of the inhabitants of Kosovo , inhibits > economic and political development in Kosovo , and contributes to > instability and radicalism in both Kosovo and Serbia;>> Whereas, in 2005, the United Nations Secretary-General appointed the > former President of Finland, Martti Ahtisaari, as United Nations Special > Envoy for Kosovo to develop a comprehensive settlement proposal to resolve > the political status of Kosovo ;>> Whereas, in March 2007, after 14 months of intensive diplomacy, Special > Envoy Ahtisaari submitted to the Security Council a comprehensive > settlement proposal that would result in supervised independence for > Kosovo , with robust protections for the rights of minorities; and>> Whereas Special Envoy Ahtisaari has explored every reasonable avenue for > compromise in the course of his diplomacy and has stated that further > negotiations would be counterproductive: Now, therefore, be it>>> Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that-->> (1) the United States should support the independence of Kosovo in > accordance with its currently constituted borders, a resolution that > represents the only just, sustainable solution for an economically viable > and politically stable Kosovo ;>> (2) the United States should, in consultation and cooperation with its > allies, vigorously and promptly pursue a United Nations Security Council > resolution that endorses the recommendations of United Nations Special > Envoy for Kosovo Martti Ahtisaari;>> (3) in the absence of timely action by the United Nations Security > Council, the United States should be prepared to act in conjunction with > like-minded democracies to confer diplomatic recognition on, and establish > full diplomatic relations with, Kosovo as an independent state, much as > the United States worked in cooperation with like-minded democracies to > protect the people of Kosovo in 1999;>> (4) the United States should oppose any delay in the resolution of the > political status of Kosovo as counterproductive, potentially dangerous, > and likely to make the achievement of a lasting settlement more difficult;>> (5) the United States should work together with the European Union as a > full partner in supporting the political and economic development of an > independent Kosovo ;>> (6) the United States should support the integration of Kosovo into > international and Euro-Atlantic institutions, including its timely > admission to the Partnership for Peace program of the North Atlantic > Treaty Organisation (NATO), with the ultimate goal of full membership in > NATO;>> (7) the United States should reaffirm its commitment to southeastern > Europe, including the continuation of the military mission in Kosovo to > deter and disrupt any efforts by any party to destabilize the region > through violence;>> (8) the Government of Kosovo should exercise responsible leadership > under supervised independence and thereby accelerate the transition to > full independence, taking particular care to reassure, protect, and ensure > the full political and economic rights of Serb and other minority > communities in Kosovo ;>> (9) the Government of Kosovo should make every reasonable effort to > develop a cooperative relationship with the Government of Serbia, in > recognition of its legitimate interests in the safety of the Serb > population in Kosovo and in the protection and preservation of the > patrimonial sites of the Serbian Orthodox Church in Kosovo ; and>> (10) the Government of Serbia should exercise responsible leadership > and seize the opportunity and the imperative presented by the independence > of Kosovo to end the dark chapter of the 1990s and focus its energies > toward achieving a prosperous and peaceful future through regional > cooperation and integration into Euro-Atlantic institutions, including > NATO and the European Union, and toward the establishment of open, > constructive relations with the government of Kosovo .


Of course this action must be opposed. God will Do the Rest.